The Righteous Mantle of Improving Humanity

Fifth in the PE Series, Reviewing Chapter Four

The Übermensch and the Antichrist by Douglas Woodward is the fourth essay in Pandemonium's Engine. I enjoyed reading Mr. Woodward's bio online. I believe you would too. If you visit the website that includes his bio, you will find a promotional video for his recently published book, The Revealing.

The German word Übermensch was coined by the German atheistic philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche who influenced Hitler's eugenics quest. "The German prefix Über can have connotation of superiority, transcendence, excessiveness, or intensity, depending on the words to which it is prepended. Mensch refers to a member of the human species, rather than to a man specifically." (p. 166)

Woodward discusses the spirit of the Antichrist (I John 4:1-3) in the work of many authors and political figures of the late 19th and the 20th centuries, quoting from Nietzsche and exposing the occult involvements of German and British figures including Winston Churchill.

It is likewise at work today, and Woodward includes some quotations to illustrate. Here is one:

And the other thing, because no one has the guts to say it, if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes why shouldn't we? What's wrong with it?… Evolution can be just …cruel, and to say that we've got a perfect genome and there's some sanctity to it? I'd just like to know where that idea comes from. It's utter silliness. - James Watson, Nobel Laureate (p. 169)

Woodward notes that as Christians we need to remember who is behind the push to alter the human genome:

[In Ephesians 6:11-12] Paul intimates that the forces are many, are not monolithic (they are diverse — there isn't just one devil); they are highly organized, and live in an unseen world surrounding us.

The Wizard of Oz said to Dorothy, "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain." Yet, the Bible counsels that the "man behind the curtain" is really the collective sinister force behind all the evil that we encounter in the empirical world. Forgetting who's behind the scenes weakens our ability to stand firm against this power. To arm ourselves properly, we must remember what we're up against. When we encounter push back, it's a good time to stop and recall that our struggle isn't against mere mortals and human institutions.

Woodward warns us that while the spirit of Antichrist has been in the world over all the ages, it is in our generation that this spirit manifests in a "distinctively different and much more understated style, albeit in the end more destructive." (p. 159) He notes, "It's interesting that John didn't use the term, Antichrist, in his Apocalypse (which we know today as the Book of Revelation), penned 10 years before his epistles. There his description of the Antichrist was, The Beast." (p. 158)

The final paragraph of Chapter Four warns us:

The Spirit of the Antichrist in the 21st century will wrap itself in the righteous mantle of "improving humanity." Bible-believing Jews and Christians will be challenged as the "evil doers" — primary obstacles to human progress — that insist on the purity of the human genome. Are we ready to defend the sanctity of God's greatest creation? Are we ready for the probable persecution that lies ahead?

These are good questions.

Mark of the Best? or the Beast?

Second in a Series, Reviewing Chapter One of Pandemonium’s Engine

As mentioned in the previous post, I am re-adding this series to the new version of SistersSite. The book and its warnings are as relevant now as they were six years ago, maybe more so.

Pandemonium’s Engine (PE) comprises 12 articles. The first and longest at about 70 pages is by Thomas Horn, D.D., the book’s coordinator. It is titled Pandemonium and “HER” Children.

Have you heard of the JASONs? Learn more here. They advise the US government on scientific and technology issues. In 2010 they emphasized the need to place high priority on enhanced-human research. That is one example of groups and institutions with a high profile that are encouraging the leap to genetic reengineering and its resultant sidelines.

Aware of these developments, Dr. Horn decided to answer the 2011 American Academy of Religion Call for Papers on aspects of Transhumanism and Religion. His paper, titled “Transhumanism and Conservative Eschatology,” presents “the technologies imagined by transhumanists… followed by critical, ethical and eschatological concerns held by conservative Christian scholars.” (p 4)

Many today believe that mankind is at the precipice of the next step in human evolution, never mind that evolution is only a religion, not a science. That is why studies on the Ethics of Human Enhancement have been undertaken. You can download the report here.

Here are some of the questions raised in that study. See if you can answer them.

  • What is human enhancement?
  • Does human enhancement raise issues of fairness, access, and equity?
  • What kind of societal disruptions might arise from human enhancement?
  • If individuals are enhanced differently, will communication be more difficult or impossible?
  • Will we need to rethink the notion of a “good life”?
  • Should children be enhanced?
  • What are the policy implications of human enhancement?

Here is a paragraph from the Report that helps to explain what Human Enhancement is:

As examples of emerging technologies in the last year or so, a couple imaginative inventions in particular, among many, are closing the gap even more between science fiction and the real world. Scientists have conceptualized an electronic-packed contact lens that may provide the wearer with telescopic and night vision or act as an omnipresent digital monitor to receive and relay information (Parviz, et al., 2008). Another innovation is a touch display designed to be implanted just under the skin that would activate special tattoo ink on one’s arm to form images, such as telephone-number keys to punch or even a video to watch (Mielke, 2008). Together with ever-shrinking computing devices, we appear to be moving closer to cybernetic organisms (or “cyborgs”), that is, where machines are integrated with our bodies or at least with our clothing in the nearer-term. Forget about Pocket PCs, mobile phones, GPS devices, and other portable gadgets; we might soon be able to communicate and access those capabilities without having to carry any external device, thus raising our productivity, efficiency, response time, and other desirable measures—in short, enabling us to even better survive our world.

Perhaps most people would not find that type of embedded technology a problem. However, what about the invention of genetically modified plants that cause second generation seeds to be sterile? That requires genetic reengineering. And what about applying such techniques to humans?

Thomas Horn reports (p. 55) that technology exists today that can reengineer a human being to no longer be purely human. If DNA is introduced by vectors that provide the means of transport and integration for gene alteration,

a human can have hybridized skin cells that glow in the dark, or perhaps form scales rather than hair, claws rather than fingernails…Muscle cells may grow larger and more efficient at using low levels of calcium and oxygen… hybrid ears may now sense a wider range of sounds.
…If so many scientists (funded by government entities) believe in the “promise” of genetic alteration and transgenic “enhancement,” how then can humanity remain human? We cannot. We will not. Perhaps, some have not."

If you believe man was created as a special kind, in the image of God, then Dr. Horn's insight will jar you.

Would you accept a vaccination, let's say, during a pandemic, if it introduced an animal-human strain that would rewrite your DNA so that you would no longer be entirely human, but part beast?

Angel fish bild.JPG
Public Domain, Link

...and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind ... the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind ...the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. -Genesis 1


A SistersSite eBook

Flesh and Bone and The Protestant Conscience is an e-book on It is 99¢ and in the Amazon lending library as well. The book description follows.

Would you let your conscience be your guide?

Does God care if the skin and bone of the dead are passed along to the living for medical uses? Is organ donation OK with God? Should you sign a Living Will?

Did you know that dead organ donors are often anesthetized before their organs are removed? Do you know the current definition of death? The conscience cannot function without facts.

As we ponder the ethics of in vitro fertilization, stem cell research and man-made chimeras, our thoughts trail off. How then should we live? (Ez 33:10)

How should a Christian think about euthanasia by starvation when doctors and the state attorney general all agree it is time to withhold feeding from a brain injured patient? Some things are family matters, but someday it may be our family.

Here is a small book to help you think about whether you want to sign your driver's license, donate a kidney, cremate your loved one, and many other practical questions that may arise in the course of your healthcare decisions or watch over others.

It offers a special focus on the doctrine of the Resurrection that is related to such decisions. Sunday School classes and Bible Study groups could use this book to facilitate discussion about the issues covered.