Bible truth, body parts and the resurrection

The Sanctity of Life and the Resurrection - First in a Series

Is God offended if your body parts are parceled out to others after you die? This was the question I pursued in a previous blog series, Flesh & Bone & The Protestant Conscience, that was later converted to an e-book.

I concluded that he is, with a few exceptions, because of the doctrine of the resurrection. Yet, I wanted to further think about this when time allowed. Perhaps I would decide I was wrong and would change my view, or maybe I would become more convinced that a Christian ought to be buried, not cremated, whole, except for those body parts lost in the catastrophes of life.

Is there any Scriptural warrant for this viewpoint? That is the key question. If there is not, then it is simply an issue that the Lord expects us to proceed with as best we can. For example, in the Live Kidney Donation series, we saw that the Southern Baptist Convention has taken a stand that sharing organs is OK, in part because “Complete resurrection of the body does not depend on bodily wholeness at death.”

Church committees, pastors, theologians, ethicists and laypeople think about these issues. How should a Christian think about his body? As a repository of useful parts that may help other people to live if we will only sign our driver’s license or become a living donor? Or is the human body to be viewed as sacrosanct?

Why be stingy with your parts? After all, can’t the almighty God reconstitute each person’s body no matter where its parts may be? If you can believe in the resurrection, then you can believe God can engineer it without our being buried whole.

In this advanced biomedical age, why should we consider an old fashioned burial essential to Christian thought and practice? Taking into account the expense, is it not unseemly? Wouldn’t a modest Christian desire to be cremated? Wouldn’t a caring Christian desire for his body to be used for as many medical needs as possible as an act of charity?

See how quickly we slide from once-cherished beliefs to condemnation of them and of ourselves? Yes, just as the devil attacked the doctrine of creation in the 20th century, neatly severing the first chapters of Genesis from the Bible, and from men’s acceptance of its necessity to belief, so now in the 21st century he is cleverly dividing the Christian mind from its grasp of the doctrine of the Resurrection.

The more sharing of body parts that goes on, the more cremation that takes place, the more hollowing out of Christian doctrine that occurs, the more Christian churches that close— and before we know it, a great apostasy has slipped in beneath our noses so quietly that we hardly noticed.

In this series we want to consider at least seven reasons from Scripture that belief in the doctrine of the Resurrection means a Christian should not share body parts and should be buried, not cremated. We want to consider that the sanctity of life extends beyond natural death to the resurrection, from a logical perspective. Perhaps most will not agree with this perspective. All comments are welcome.

Next

Good biotech news at the start of a good new year

Starting the New Year on a positive note, we see that a team of bioengineering researchers at the University of Louisville (Ky.) is working on a new way to dry blood to make it much more portable and durable...

InsiderLouisville.com | Boris Ladwig | January 2 2018

biotechnology and blood vessel Credit: Chris Mason. CC BY Today, blood can be stored in refrigerators no longer than 42 days before it has to be discarded, per Food and Drug Administration rules. To store blood longer, it has to go through a cumbersome freezing process that involves the addition of glycerol, which has to be removed during the thawing process. Frozen blood can be kept for 10 years — but it has to be stored in a freezer at -112 degrees Fahrenheit, which makes it costly and impractical for uses in remote locations. The thawing process also takes several hours, which makes it impractical when the blood is needed immediately, such as when a soldier is hemorrhaging from a grievous wound on the battlefield.

With dried blood, doctors could simply add water and, within minutes, use the rehydrated blood for a transfusion. Soldiers, for example, could carry dried blood in a pack that also contains some water.

The UofL researchers’ approach to drying blood involves the use of trehalose, a sugar that enables some plants and animals to survive long periods — even thousands of years — of extreme dryness.

While other scientists have combined the sugar and blood, the UofL researchers have significantly accelerated the process by firing ultrasound at a solution of blood and trehalose to enable the blood to absorb the sugar. The local researchers’ approach also has significantly increased the share of blood that is viable after drying and rehydration. Read more.


Blood facts

Is blood an organ?

According to the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA), blood is not an organ. NOTA makes it a crime for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human organ for valuable consideration for use in human transplantation if the transfer affects interstate commerce.

On the Biology Stack Exchange there is a discussion on whether or not blood is an organ. If it can be viewed to be an organ then it is much easier to argue that organ transplantation is reasonable.

Does blood contain DNA?

Because of the lack of nuclei and organelles, mature red blood cells do not contain DNA and cannot synthesize any RNA, and consequently cannot divide and have limited repair capabilities. The inability to carry out protein synthesis means that no virus can evolve to target mammalian red blood cells. (ref) White blood cells contain DNA but are in minuscule proportion to the red.

Live blood and dead blood

Organ harvesting requires that the person be declared dead while at the same time the blood of a live man flow through the blood vessels. Read more on Dr. Greg Kenyon’s blog. (Dr. Kenyon’s blog feed has been added to Biotech’s Blogroll, below right.)

Does a preborn baby have or use his mother’s blood?

The blood of the fetus does not mix with the blood of the mother. Instead, the placenta provides a system where the two separate blood streams flow past each other with thin separation allowing nutrients to flow between the two streams but the not the blood cells and other large components. (ref)

Mother and child can have different blood types with no problem because they are never shared. That's why women with HIV/AIDS do not pass the virus to their unborn child, most of the time babies get infected during birth, when they go out of the uterus. (ref)

Bloodless surgery the gold standard

It began as a way to allow Jehovah’s Witnesses and others with religious prohibitions on blood transfusions to undergo surgeries. But at some hospitals, bloodless surgeries are now the preferred method for all patients. “If there’s any way to avoid getting a blood transfusion, one is better off in general if they can avoid it,” says Dr. Abe Steinberger, a neurosurgeon at Englewood Hospital in New Jersey. (ref)

Angel fish
Public Domain, Link

...and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind ... the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind ...the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. -Genesis 1

Search

A SistersSite eBook

Flesh and Bone and The Protestant Conscience is an e-book on Amazon.com. It is 99¢ and in the Amazon lending library as well. It is also available here in PDF format. The book description follows.

Would you let your conscience be your guide?

Does God care if the skin and bone of the dead are passed along to the living for medical uses? Is organ donation OK with God? Should you sign a Living Will?

Did you know that dead organ donors are often anesthetized before their organs are removed? Do you know the current definition of death? The conscience cannot function without facts.

As we ponder the ethics of in vitro fertilization, stem cell research and man-made chimeras, our thoughts trail off. How then should we live? (Ez 33:10)

How should a Christian think about euthanasia by starvation when doctors and the state attorney general all agree it is time to withhold feeding from a brain injured patient? Some things are family matters, but someday it may be our family.

Here is a small book to help you think about whether you want to sign your driver's license, donate a kidney, cremate your loved one, and many other practical questions that may arise in the course of your healthcare decisions or watch over others.

It offers a special focus on the doctrine of the Resurrection that is related to such decisions. Sunday School classes and Bible Study groups could use this book to facilitate discussion about the issues covered.